11 Kasım 2015 Çarşamba

[EN] FAL[client]: Failed to request gap sequence ... FAL[client]: All defined FAL servers have been attempted.


Because of a network problem one of our physical standby database, there was some gaps.

      9597          2 +ADATA/astb/archivelog/2015_11_09/thread_2_seq_9597.1827.895359343
      9600          2 +ADATA/astb/archivelog/2015_11_09/thread_2_seq_9600.1828.895360629
      9601          2 +ADATA/astb/archivelog/2015_11_09/thread_2_seq_9601.1831.895361495
      9604          2 +ADATA/astb/archivelog/2015_11_09/thread_2_seq_9604.1825.895363191
      9607          2 +ADATA/astb/archivelog/2015_11_10/thread_2_seq_9607.1824.895364061
      9608          2 +ADATA/astb/archivelog/2015_11_10/thread_2_seq_9608.1823.895364505
      9609          2 +ADATA/astb/archivelog/2015_11_10/thread_2_seq_9609.1826.895365409

After the network problem was solved by our system team, Standby RFS processes can succesfully get recent archived logs. But could not get earlier gap archived logs. Even not try to get them. We monitor this via V$MANAGED_STANDBY view.

When we try to restart media recovery on the standby site. We still see the following alertlog warnings.